It is no secret that there is dissent within the skeptical ranks, both in terms of philosophy and method. What may be less known is that there is even drama within the micro sub-cultures of this “movement”, some of which I am less than proud to be a part of. When James Randi split from CSICOP in the 90′s, or more recently when Paul Kurtz left CFI, no one assumed their disagreements were based in gender.
However, when the disagreements are between women, certain people like to paint them as “catfights”, which lessens the seriousness of ALL involved (full disclosure – I, Heidi Anderson, am certain people). Women are not a monolithic group, and although many of us call ourselves skeptics AND feminists, we often can not agree on whether skepticism needs feminism, or feminism needs skepticism. Others shun the term feminist completely.
Some disagree with sexy behavior at cons, and others think it is good light-hearted fun that brings in people who may normally think skeptics are stodgy old white dudes. Or ONLY stodgy old white dudes. We have disagreements on sexuality, pornography, prostitution, and even things that do not specifically involve women at all (imagine that!) We are labeled too confrontational or too gentle depending on our methods of outreach.
And you know what? None of that matters. While we are busy using our freedom to prove ourselves different from our allies on the side of reason, a 42 year old mother of two in Iran is facing a death sentence resulting from a forced confession of adultery. She will be buried up to her chest, and stoned to death. Small stones will be used, so as to slow down her death and cause her more pain. And her “confession”? According to a human rights attorney, it was only gained after 99 lashes.
So, as TAM8 approaches, and friends gather, and we have panels on women in skepticism, and skepticism and feminism, and all sorts of things that we as Westerners have the luxury of thinking about, is it too much to ask the skeptical community and blogosphere to investigate this story, and see what REAL DIFFERENCES we can make? Can we step outside, as my friend Will Phillips said, “our tiny little mind boxes” and remember that as we wage these petty wars on each other, a war against reason continues to rage across the globe, with a 42 year old mother of two poised to become the next victim.
Thank you for this, Heidi. It’s important sometimes to take a step back and remember what we’re really supposed to be fighting for.
The news today is that the stoning may not take place. I dugg an article about it from the local papers online , the Herald Sun. Good luck with your help for a better world.
Nice blog site you have here.
Thanks David! I will post that!!
Excellently said, there are times when things get so heated and so full of our own passions that it is easy to lose sight of what is really important in life and what matters most. You nailed it in saying that there is room for agreeing to disagreeing on various topics and that there really is no one supreme way of doing anything. I too am blame-worthy of getting lost within my own adrenaline-fueled thoughts and lost sight of the happier and more positive ways to finding common grounds when outreaching to others. All that can be done is express a heart-felt and sincere apology and continue in working on making the present and future all the more welcoming and inviting, and not sully what it means to be a skeptic or atheist or whatever one chooses to be. There are a lot more serious issues in the world, like the one you listed in this post, that need more of our energy. Great job Heidi on putting all of it into perspective.
Thanks Tim! It really means a lot to me that you liked it :)
Just found this blog on a recomendation and havent read much yet. Having said that I found this to be a really interesting and valid post, so here’s to hoping the rest of the blog is this good :)